Doc 01 — Value & Problem Statement
A continuation close is choreography that can break mid-step.
A GP-led continuation close moves a fund's assets into a new vehicle, pays out exiting LPs, issues new units to rolling LPs, and takes in secondary-buyer capital — sequentially, not simultaneously. Today it runs over multiple weeks through lawyers and spreadsheets, and any single leg can fail mid-close. Continuum collapses the whole sequence into one atomic settlement.
The mechanics
The legs settle one after another across different parties and systems. Each leg is a separate instruction with its own timing risk. The deal is only complete when the last one clears — and there is no guarantee it will.
Three legs have settled. One has failed. The close is now stranded between two states — a legal problem, not an operational one.
Three ways it breaks
Why it matters now
The value Continuum delivers
Weeks → one atomic close
Assets, cash, and unit issuance settle all-or-nothing in a single transaction. No leg can strand the deal between two states.
No partial-close risk
Because settlement is atomic, there is no partial state to unwind. The close either completes in full or does not move.
Provable fairness, no leakage
Each LP's election stays sealed; the LPAC and regulator get a need-to-know disclosure window. Fairness is provable without exposing the book.
The continuation close stops being a multi-week legal operation with failure risk and becomes a single confidential settlement event — the same primitive guarantees both atomicity and privacy.